Thanks for the update, it's useful.
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 04:22:31PM +0200, Didier Roche wrote:> 4. Changes to how we generate debian/changelog.Hmm, it was my understanding that we were going to do this (at least
> After some discussion with the ubuntu release team and the touch
> team, we decided to finally list all the commits from the mainline
> branch automatically in debian/changelog instead of just listing
> bugs number and their titles linked to branches. This mainly comes
> from the raring release cycle feedback where we saw quite some empty
> changelog where no bugs were linked to any branch merged to mainline
> and nobody entered anything in debian/changelog.
where possible, in preference to individual commits) at the merge
proposal level instead — these usually have a commit message attached to
them and describe changes at a more coarse-grained level than the
individual commit in a manner which, to me at least, is more suitable
for the Debian changelog. I also then don't have to think about the fact
that every commit will end up in d/changelog.
As someone in the Touch team that requested this, it is my understanding and the text above doesn't mention the contrary to being just the merge commit.