On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 10:16:09AM +0200, Till Kamppeter wrote:
> On 05/18/2013 07:17 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 01:25:12PM +0200, Till Kamppeter wrote:
> >> So Ghostscript is out of the question here as it is large and the PDF
> >> interpreter is written in PostScript. Poppler has the advantage of
> >> having a long history and so it should deal best with quirky files.
> >> MuPDF is written with lightweightness in mind, is the only free software
> >> which allows filling and saving PDF forms,
> > This doesn't sound accurate to me - I've used evince before (which is
> > poppler based) to fill out PDF forms and save them. Maybe this should be
> > checked?
Thanks for the reference. However, this doesn't say "poppler does not
allow filling and saving PDF forms", it says "there is a bug in saving forms
with encrypted PDFs which is fixed in a later version of poppler." It seems
like we should just get the poppler transition done (after confirming that
it fixes the problem), and be done with it?
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/