On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Julien Lavergne <email@example.com> wrote:
2013/6/27 Oliver Ries <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
>> And to that end, do you have documented comparisons of performanceThis is currently an issue for Lubuntu, because, if i understand
>> between native X and XMir (especially for non-Unity stacks)? The video
>> demo does appear to be measuring it, but I'd be curious to see the
>> before/after results in some tabulated form.
> We are about to release our benchmark results as part of the public Ubuntu
> QA dashboard. We will inform the community once the data is available.
correctly, we are going to replace an X + openbox (without composite)
with a Mir + XMir + composite windows manager (?). Considering the
very bad performance on some of our target hardware running under a
composite manager, I'm quite worrying about the performance
difference. The difference between Unity + X and Unity + XMir + Mir
may not be so different, I can't say the same for Lubuntu.
good consideration, I'll check with the QA team to see if we can have a run in this configuration.