On 07/25/2013 05:19 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 01:34:40PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
>> == foundations ==
>> saucy-adt-pandas (regression)
> It looks like Dmitry Shachnev has fixed this up already - thanks, Dmitry!
>
> Beyond that, this is a package in universe which I don't think Foundations
> should be responsible for fixing the test suite in. I think either this
> should be owned by MOTU, like other aspects of universe are, or we should
> not run / not block on autopkgtests for unseeded packages.
<snip>
I agree that foundations shouldn't be responsible, but I'd rather not
see us get in the mindset that quality in universe is not needed. If we
can automate testing, let's display the failures like any other
failure. If after review it's decided to not block on the failure, so
be it, but let's have this be the exception and not the rule.
Thanks,
Micah
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
