Thursday, 11 July 2013

Re: Xorg was removed.. without an alternative

On 11 July 2013 08:43, Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> wrote:
> It seems so strange to spend six months saying "don't touch that" just
> to turn around and then spend nine months begging people to touch that...

I know it can be confusing, but the $devel-proposed (that should be future
proof) serves a completely different purpose than -proposed post-release.  Once
Saucy is released, saucy-proposed will serve the same purpose -proposed has
always served.  "Not for humans" only applies to the development phase.


It looks like the two different uses of -proposed should be separated, no? So a $devel release would have an always empty $devel-proposed and all that is currently pushed there would go to $devel-autobuilder-only-proposed or something and a released verison would continue as-is.

--
Best regards,
    Aigars Mahinovs        mailto:[email protected]
  #--------------------------------------------------------------#
 | .''`.    Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org)            |
 | : :' :   Latvian Open Source Assoc. (http://www.laka.lv)     |
 | `. `'    Linux Administration and Free Software Consulting   |
 |   `-                                 (http://www.aiteki.com) |
 #--------------------------------------------------------------#