Monday, 29 December 2014

Re: [Ubuntu-bugcontrol] Please, consider reflecting on the Canonical Contributor Agreement


What I don't understand is:

"2.3 Outbound License

Based on the grant of rights in Sections 2.1 and 2.2, if We
include Your Contribution in a Material, We may license the
Contribution under any license, including copyleft,
permissive, commercial, or proprietary licenses."

There is absolutely no reason to license it as proprietary software in the future?

Why not just use something like:

"We may license the
Contribution under any free and opensoure license" ?


ubuntu-devel mailing list
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: