On 01/04/2015 09:48 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> No, of course not. I'm struggling to make sense of Stephen's original
> response and it seemed to make sense from that perspective. Qt (for example)
> is clearly now a free software project and it has a CLA. There are others as
> well.
Qt's CLA is as imbalanced as the Canonical one, isn't it? In fact, I
would claim that's even worse, because while in Canonical's case there's
the *risk* that the software might be re-sold under a proprietory
license, with Qt you have the *certainty* that it's been actively sold.
Ciao,
Alberto
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
