Friday, 2 January 2015

Re: [Ubuntu-bugcontrol] Please, consider reflecting on the Canonical Contributor Agreement

On 2015-01-02 01:37 PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 2015-01-02 13:37, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> Fact is it's causing external groups to stay away from contributing to
>> Canonical projects (which contributes to the tautology that the CLA is
>> reasonable because Canonical is the primary/sole contributor). If you want a
>> specific example, the CLA is the only reason SDDM is the KDM replacement in
>> Plasma 5 and not LightDM.
> And the reason why an annoying refresh bug on Nvidia hardware is not yet fixed
> in compiz. (It's much much harder to sign a CLA when legal departments are
> involved.)

It's fixed now:


ubuntu-devel mailing list
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: