Wednesday, 27 January 2016

Re: Strongswan merge for Xenial

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=uQrI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On 2016-01-25 09:49 AM, Ryan Harper wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Simon Deziel <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> > - Other Removals from Debian
> > *logcheck* files (not relevant to StrongSwan per jpds)
>
> The logcheck files are really dated (see debian #787156) and I've
> accumulated a few rules on my own. Even at the default log level charon
> is very verbose so I think it makes sense to have the package shipping
> logcheck rules. I'd be happy to provided those.
>
>
> Yes please.

I've attached the refreshed logcheck rules to your merge LP [*].

Simon

*: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/strongswan/+bug/1535951