Tuesday, 2 February 2016

Re: Ubuntu Desktop on i386

Quoting Dimitri John Ledkov (xnox@ubuntu.com):
> On 2 February 2016 at 07:58, Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com> wrote:
> > On 01.02.2016 23:14, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Ubuntu has an i386 port which is fully supported.
> >>
> >> There a bunch of 3rd party applications that rely on the Multi-Arch
> >> technology to support/use i386 binaries on amd64 (e.g. Skype from the
> >> partner archive). BTW, can we ask Microsoft to publish native amd64
> >> binaries, rather than those that rely on multi-arch i386? Also, does
> >> Valve Steam product rely on i386 multiarch binaries? or is it fully
> >> amd64? (and e.g. downloads/bundles/ships any required i386 binaries
> >> that it needs)? And Netflix - does that run on amd64-only without i386
> >> multiarch?
> >>
> >> However, it seems to me that this is done specifically on otherwise
> >> full amd64 installations.
> >>
> >> My guess is that: all currently shipped hardware, with enough support
> >> to run full Unity (7) Desktop, is amd64. Tested with amd64 kernel, and
> >> amd64 graphics drivers. And hardware validation is done on amd64 too.
> >>
> >> In 2016, people with i386-only hardware are unlikely to be capable to
> >> run Unity 7 Desktop, and probably run other Ubuntu variants. I guess
> >> there are some accidental i386 users, e.g. those that have installed
> >> i386 variant on amd64 hardware.
> >
> > Just wondering whether you considered netbooks here. Not that old (maybe 6y?)
> > and at least the two specimens I would have around are early Atoms (i386 only)
> > but with (also early) i915 Intel graphics. They used to be reasonably
> > accelerated to cope. Not sure about unity 7. But maybe some reason to allow at
> > least for 16.04 some i386 iso (by 18.04 the problem might be resolved through
> > the crappy life-span recent hw seems to have)...
> >
> My argument here would be that, such a netbook already has Ubuntu on it.
> And that one would not want to /install/ it, but only /upgrade/ it to 16.04 LTS.
> And thus archive-only support is sufficient for it.

Until he needs to replace the hd.

Stefan, it might be worth checking whether Dimitri is right about unity7
not woring on that hardware anyway. Can you try a xenial desktop livecd?

ubuntu-devel mailing list
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel