On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 11:23:56AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Frankly, I don't see the point in writing this kind of software. Sbuild
> works super well with the overlay backend, and already has throw-able
> chroots in tmpfs. Adding docker into this doesn't add any new feature,
> and in some way, is less flexible than the already existing sbuild.
Something that comes to mind is network isolation, which sbuild still
doesn't seem to have proper support for: