<rafaeldtinoco@ubuntu.com> wrote:
>
> On 29/04/2020 00:10, Rafael David Tinoco wrote:
>
> Dan, Billy, and all...
>
> part of the result from this thread is at:
>
> https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/ubuntu-ha-pacemaker-resource-agents-supportability/
>
> And the fence agents can be found over here
>
> https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/ubuntu-ha-pacemaker-fence-agents-supportability/15768
>
> The same (as bellow) applies to this list.
I'm +1 on the discussion there, for resource and fence agents. I
think splitting them up makes a lot of sense to better categorize them
by supportability.
>
>
> and will at the Ubuntu Server Guide for 20.04 (Ubuntu HA session being finished).
>
> I changed wording to guarantee this is seen as a community effort and to differentiate from any Ubuntu Advantage offering.
>
> Categories are:
>
> Resource Agents: [main]
> Resource Agents: [universe]
> Resource Agents: [universe]-community
> Resource Agents: [non-supported]
> Resource Agents: [deprecated]
>
>
> From now on, in my head, we're 1:1 with Ubuntu Advantage in nomenclature. Note that resource-agents are in [main] and fence-agents are in [universe]. Despite that, the list is what defines our efforts for support - server & SEG - on those, at least until I split all agents into more packages.
>
> I'm creating another discourse for fencing-agents as well, same thing.
>
> Please give me your +1 if possible, and feel free to -1 with suggestions.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -rafaeldtinoco
>
> On 07/04/2020 23:47, Rafael David Tinoco wrote:
>
> I added a few comments below, otherwise all the categories look
> reasonable to me, thanks!
>
> Thanks for the feedback Dan!
>
>
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
