On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 at 05:42, Julian Andres Klode <julian.klode@canonical.com> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 05:29:19PM +0100, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Hey again,
>
> Le 08/12/2021 à 00:14, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> > I expect that with this option set, we will find much fewer problems with
> > entanglement of library transitions, and in turn I hope developers will be
> > less frustrated by migration delays.
> Right, I expect that to be the case. It's going to come at the cost of
> reducing the pressure for the team to complete the transitions since that's
> not going to get in the way of having their updates to land.
> My personal feeling is that it's going to turn out to be an issue for the
> archive and the release teams and that we aren't going to find proper
> staffing to deal with the problems, but hopefully I'm wrong there, we will
> see.
I think we should
- disable smoothing at feature freeze
So we're now a little past feature freeze and smooth_updates is still in effect. This made the recent python/perl/the world transition a bit easier so that was probably a good thing overall but now that's behind us, maybe we should disable it now?
- work on getting NBS to 0 by beta freeze
So this becomes less of a whackamole.
Cheers.
mwh
If it doesn't work, maybe we need to revert to not autosmoothing
and force or add a smooth hint.
--
debian developer - deb.li/jak | jak-linux.org - free software dev
ubuntu core developer i speak de, en
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
