On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:37:26AM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jul 29, 2013, at 12:43 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> >I made a first stab at documenting the proposed-migration workflow
> >(https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ProposedMigration).
>
> I didn't understand the last sentence here:
>
> "Furthermore, the Ubuntu process has no arbitrary delays and no consideration
> of release-critical bugs, so there is very little benefit to users in using
> -proposed and such use is strongly discouraged. Packages should normally be
> built against -proposed."
>
> Is this a recommendation or statement of fact? IOW, while we shouldn't be
> using -proposed, we should build packages (e.g. local test builds) against
> -proposed. Or does it mean that the system itself builds packages against
> -proposed?
It's meant as both. I've rephrased to make that more explicit. How
does https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ProposedMigration?action=diff&rev1=2&rev2=3
look?
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@ubuntu.com]
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
