Sweet, I've made the modifications manually after running dkms mkdsc.
However, I'll figure out how to put that into the template files and
send you a patch when I can and after testing on my end.
Of course I'll send them upstream first. : )
Now to just find some downtime to hack on this!
--chris j arges
On 10/03/2013 03:30 PM, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> It's been on the backburner for me for a while. Send patches to
> firstname.lastname@example.org <mailto:email@example.com> and i'm
> happy to look at them.
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Martin Pitt <firstname.lastname@example.org
> <mailto:email@example.com>> wrote:
> Hey Chris,
> Chris J Arges [2013-09-04 16:00 -0500]:
> > I examined the package that dkms mkdsc generates and I noticed a
> few things:
> > 1) debian/rules doesn't use newer DH stuff like "%: dh $@ --with dkms"
> > 2) debian/control's Standards-Version / debhelper versions are
> fairly old.
> > Is there a reason for this, or is this a 'patches are welcome' sort of
> > thing?
> It's just "nobody has touched dkms for a while". Not sure how active
> upstream still is (Mario?), but I'd rather have these intrusive
> changes upstream than carrying huge patches in Ubuntu only (package in
> Debian also isn't very active).
> Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de
> Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com <http://www.ubuntu.com>) | Debian
> Developer (www.debian.org <http://www.debian.org>)
> Mario Limonciello
> firstname.lastname@example.org <mailto:email@example.com>
ubuntu-devel mailing list
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel