Friday, 15 November 2013

Re: Handling of layout/input methods in Unity: what should we do for the LTS?

Hi Sebastien,

On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 16:04:14 +0100
Sebastien Bacher <> wrote:

> Did we loose our indicator in the ibus 1.4->1.5 transition? We should
> add it back in that's the case, yes
This is the dropped patch.

> That's a topic that is going to be discussed at vUDS next week:
I see.
Many Japanese users dislike IBus 1.5. Some Japanese users say it is
a crap. Of course I don't think so.
Such users switch to Fcitx or uim which is default input method
on Debian.
Fcitx(fcitx and fcitx-mozc) is well-worked, well-translated
for Japanese users.
IBus 1.5 is not bad. But I found some issues.
If these problems will be fixed, IBus 1.5 will make better than now

AWASHIRO Ikuya / /
GPG fingerprint:
1A19 AD66 C53F 2250 3537 1A9D 3A53 2C1D 20AB CC8A

ubuntu-devel mailing list
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: