Friday, 15 November 2013

Re: Handling of layout/input methods in Unity: what should we do for the LTS?

Hi Sebastien,

On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 16:04:14 +0100
Sebastien Bacher <[email protected]> wrote:

> Did we loose our indicator in the ibus 1.4->1.5 transition? We should
> add it back in that's the case, yes
This is the dropped patch.
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/saucy/ibus/saucy/revision/56#debian/patches/05_appindicator.patch

> That's a topic that is going to be discussed at vUDS next week:
> http://summit.ubuntu.com/uds-1311/meeting/21984/desktop-1311-default-imf-review/
I see.
Many Japanese users dislike IBus 1.5. Some Japanese users say it is
a crap. Of course I don't think so.
Such users switch to Fcitx or uim which is default input method
on Debian.
Fcitx(fcitx and fcitx-mozc) is well-worked, well-translated
for Japanese users.
IBus 1.5 is not bad. But I found some issues.
If these problems will be fixed, IBus 1.5 will make better than now
hopefully.

Thanks,
--
AWASHIRO Ikuya
[email protected] / [email protected] / [email protected]
GPG fingerprint:
1A19 AD66 C53F 2250 3537 1A9D 3A53 2C1D 20AB CC8A

--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel