On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 02:29:04PM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> Hi Martin,
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 05:08:36PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > Apport has actually done that for a long time, and mark these crash
> > reports with "UnreportableReason". Almost all of the unreportable ones
> > get uploaded to errors anyway (I'm not particularly happy about that,
> > but that's the status quo), but we specifically blacklist the ones for
> > this case (i. e. "binary upgraded underneath you"). Is that broken?
> > I. e. do you have an example where this actually did get sent to
> > errors.u.c.? We should fix that ASAP then.
> No, I dont have any firm proof of that. I sometimes saw "the" resolved
> stacktraces where the linenumbers were off for the version of the source I was
> looking at -- but then again this has to be expected when there are different
> versions affected by the same crash (Im blissfully ignorant about how apport
> matches those as "the same" though anyway).
I'm interested in seeing an example of the problem.
ubuntu-devel mailing list
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel