-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJUR96gAAoJECWAD5grd+mNgikP/3t01TujmwsLK5q6VtupQ915
PqnOZxQ1j0Tc0UGKSdDzGtms/WntDjoON7yZQl2oDLwXq24izCKQPimKXJAMVALv
5N+leRxLnDS5vmY3c1Nw9ugk0Zbjjd6GXEktvGfAP/y1hWdxaw6Tq6q01kfxQBqc
Cs649jwC7X6k8+7/i+0syz20555C38AuuK6rj/MYDdILX+pJ0aSR1UMeoGrlyi85
UPt0bKgXOBy5R+Kc1BHzjzNn+Znm1ylooliw/MCbPDFxVnYNmZ02Y6ck4YnbPoYj
pMYOP8X4f0ySx1xsM2f9WRJntSH7S7Jbeytxku+WoLKPioNAPPtmVuVxptu87okz
6mDaVTV5b3z/DeFrKkJgSztuWDh9Sqlelyhav+prX4PymLkftZbeahSrxCYVUpAl
v51+MNabB0ocirrYs8VBFhBUmjHgvoIF0Jdx30PpwBe0RFrazG7R2yzg5frzk+J9
tMF0z5IGIS4ebuc5kZvoPb/WoFFmDtHTMXWC2/SlBAMTCDfRNCOF7ZdXr9VSjHrx
ZQ1WRcpRYw71+0fvLBxjYBcZagHUB1Rkt9zUQ33fJGqZKIRg7+eF8BkyJvI9VkBN
sIPnjBAiVk7yFdKZdMXGPW57lDU/1DRQDDhafkESrc8uqEOcCUHaLQQKLXAMlvUw
95l58WOnv9ka+YcnGUP7
=OMWo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On 22/10/14 09:13, Robie Basak wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:10:05AM -0400, Bryan Quigley wrote:
>> Could we just switch everything over to ntp? Is their a downside to
>> this I'm missing?
>
> Desktop machines may not be online all the time. In this case, ntp won't
> really work very well, and it might be better just to sync the time when
> a connection comes up. ntpdate works better for this case.
Actually, this is not completely correct. NTP does have an option to
make a large change on startup, via the "-g" parameter. This is pretty
much all ntpdate does (sync the clock on net interface startup), so ntpd
can replace ntpdate without any other issues.
Of course, there is still the net interface up calling ntpdate, but this
is not major.
..C..