Sunday 30 October 2016

Re: Promote adobe-flashplugin over flashplugin-installer

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEuBAEBCAAYBQJYFdRHERxwa2VybkBkZWJpYW4ub3JnAAoJEERuJUU10FbsZpwH
/AsFTCG3PPvq0hC5yMWuSqKHFEbNQix8OaimlzX4W2sQo4XdoD+69LxTSP0tm5Oz
viPbCYAtw7Qp9kd1SkJ3a6SZERyMiuSFrFn0zoi0y9k/ADrI2MHc+lPbohOJNxtl
uSKpHzvs/+PxsVyoIdJyMuqcSjvZkc+AaYXUZcwgypWEeA3YhLosZ9oFGDGmNbMi
3aZReWXU452aHw5abqqbsVEgecJKRzw+s1MNckK7NwOk2fKZFTygfsntm1cyT+Oq
TXTZ0Iy+J8kUPvlY7tlMqhJCssnRBNK8BfnXba2q/MbR36njUzFJ1pmL8h/fyi8A
qPMXVl32WljVIyPlHLBhx7c=
=B9pG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On 10/28/2016 08:38 PM, Seth Arnold wrote:
> The version of the package that downloads the flash binaries within the
> package is going to be far more resilient against these failures, because
> apt knows how to recover from nearly everything (except open wifi points
> with captive http login portal nonsense).

FWIW, I think this has been fixed in recent apt versions, which have a
much improved caching logic.

Kind regards
Philipp Kern