> Hi Matthias,
>
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 12:35:09PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Here are results for a cosmic test rebuild (main only), combining the release
>> and the updates pocket:
>
>> http://people.canonical.com/~doko/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20190404-cosmic.html
>
>> Bug reports are filed with tags ftbfs and rls-cc-incoming. No new reports are
>> filed where the issue still exists in the most recent disco test rebuild.
>
> Do you have any particular expectation regarding what teams will do with the
> rls-cc-incoming bugs? I know Foundations does not actively process this
> queue for stable releases and I would not expect other teams to do so
> either.
I don't have high expectations, what should be done with cosmic and the
remaining 3 1/2 months of support. That test rebuild was needed as a baseline
to compare with the GCC 8.3, Python 2.7.16, Python 3.7.3 updates planned for
cosmic, and later on for bionic. Build failures might hide issues for such a
comparison. I still think that ftbfs issues should be fixed in the LTS releases
so that these don't need to be addressed when a security updates is required.
The advise given by the SRU team was to file all these with priority high, and
tagging as rls-XX-incoming.
Matthias
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
