Tuesday 9 April 2019

Re: Proposal: drop rails and its reverse-dependencies from Ubuntu 19.04 [Re: Maintaining language-specific module package stacks]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=0gtd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On 4/9/19 9:27 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> rails is ready to migrate, there is no puma package in the release pocket. the
> failing puma autopkg test in -proposed shouldn't be any concern.
>
> Filed LP: #1824049 for that.
>
> Now we could go on removing puma from -proposed, and then rails should migrate.
> How can we do that without removal?

(disclaimer: not on the release team)

This isn't a bug in Britney; Britney is designed to block on *any*
autopkgtest failures if there aren't any test hints (thus, a documented
reason for it failing). Passing autopkgtests for all packages is a
release goal, and unless the package has a hint (which is an exception
to the rule), any failing autopkgtests shouldn't let a package into the
release pocket. This autopkgtest should be evaluated to see if it's a
real regression in rails or if it's puma autopkgtests not working properly.

--
Simon Quigley
tsimonq2@ubuntu.com
tsimonq2 on freenode and OFTC
5C7A BEA2 0F86 3045 9CC8
C8B5 E27F 2CF8 458C 2FA4