Friday 22 January 2021

Re: +1 maintenance report (dogtag-pki vs 389-ds-base)

On Friday, January 22 2021, Lukas Märdian wrote:

> Hey!
>
> Together with Timo I was debugging this issue a little further, and we were
> able to pinpoint the faulty commit, introducing the regression:
> https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/commit/2ccd0bed4e60e44303d5f1cf96bd30572ffea85b
>
> We reverted that commit and tested dogtag-pki vs custom 389-ds-base in a
> PPA, to confirm it passes:
> https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-hirsute-slyon-testing/hirsute/s390x/d/dogtag-pki/20210122_114408_9ecb1@/log.gz
>
> And Timo got in touch with the upstream developers to raise the issue there:
> https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/issues/4563

Thanks a lot for the investigative work, guys!

--
Sergio
GPG key ID: E92F D0B3 6B14 F1F4 D8E0 EB2F 106D A1C8 C3CB BF14

--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel