> On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 at 05:31, Paride Legovini <paride@ubuntu.com> wrote:
>
> > mathcomp-multinomials:
> > - holding 3 packages
> > - missing builds on all archs but riscv64
> > - reason: missing b-deps (riscv64 got lucky because it slow)
> > - retriggered builds; built everywhere but on arm64.
> > - reason for missing arm64 build:
> > .
> > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > libcoq-mathcomp-bigenough : Depends: libcoq-mathcomp-ssreflect-94ef7
> > E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
> > .
> > - HANDOVER: I think we just need a no-change rebuild of
> > src:mathcomp-bigenough to rebuild against a newer ssreflect.
> >
>
> I did this.
I like how Paride called out the item to handover to another person on
+1 maintenance in their report (and of course that it was picked up!).
Could we make using this format (HANDOVER) a convention for passing
things on in our reports?
Thanks!
--
Brian Murray
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
