On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 3:09 AM Otto Kekäläinen <otto@ubuntu.com> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 at 13:07, Andreas Hasenack
> <andreas.hasenack@canonical.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Otto,
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 9:38 PM Otto Kekäläinen <otto@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Related to the new docs and process clarification, how should one
> > > today request for the microrelease exception?
> > >
> > > Page https://canonical-sru-docs.readthedocs-hosted.com/en/latest/reference/requirements/#new-upstream-microreleases
> > > does not specify exactly how to do it.
> >
> > Following some links from the new documentation, I arrived at
> > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Documentation_for_Special_Cases
> >
> > The Technical Board resolution on Landscape
> > (https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-announce/2009-March/000550.html)
> > provides a general rationale for the types of special cases that may
> > be approved here in future. Most exception approvals are now handled
> > directly by the SRU team.
> > To obtain a new ongoing exception such as those documented below:
> > Draft a wiki page, like the ones below, outlining what you believe
> > should be the exception.
> > Submit it to the SRU team for approval. This can be done to any
> > individual member of the SRU team directly, or you can send it to
> > ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com for review.
> >
> > The more recent exceptions, like OpenVPN, bind9, openldap, and others,
> > could be a good starting point.
>
> Thanks for confirming that
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates still stands despite the
> first sentence on the page, or at least half of the page. I will
> follow the examples there.
It's exactly these exceptions that were not yet migrated to the new
docs. The link I followed came from the new docs, so yeah, these still
stand for now.
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
