On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 3:11 PM Graham Inggs <ginggs@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> libmaus2 migration
> ==================
> libmaus2 no longer builds on arm64. I requested removal of the arm64
> binaries of libmaus2 and its reverse-dependency biobambam2 (which were
> also removed from Debian) in LP: #2106240
Actioned by Simon Chopin already.
> meep and meep-mpi-default migration
> ===================================
> The recent syncs of these packages stopped building on armhf. I was
> about to file a bug requesting removal of the binaries, but found that
> jbicha had already filed LP: #2106128
Done - removed both armhf binaries.
> partclone migration
> ===================
> Debian stopped building partclone on big-endian architectures. I
> filed LP: #2106325 requesting removal of the s390x binaries.
Actioned by Simon Chopin already.
> last-align migration
> ====================
> Debian stopped building last-align on 32-bit architectures, so I
> requested removal of the armhf binaries in LP: #2106331
Actioned by Simon Chopin already.
> The new version of last-align also caused a regression in nanook,
> which was removed from Debian testing. I updated LP: #2103924
> requesting removal of nanook.
Thanks - RM'd nanook. But why is the bug also targeting last-align?
IIUC, only nanook should be removed, right? Or am I missing something?
- u
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
