On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 at 16:06, Utkarsh Gupta <utkarsh.gupta@canonical.com> wrote:
> > The new version of last-align also caused a regression in nanook,
> > which was removed from Debian testing. I updated LP: #2103924
> > requesting removal of nanook.
>
> Thanks - RM'd nanook. But why is the bug also targeting last-align?
> IIUC, only nanook should be removed, right? Or am I missing something?
It also affects last-align, in that nanook's autopkgtest regression
blocks the migration of last-align.
Having last-align as an affected package, together with the
'update-excuse' tag, makes a link to the bug appear in last-align's
migration status on update_excuses.html, like so:
last-align (1542-1 to 1609-1)
Migration status for last-align (1542-1 to 1609-1): BLOCKED:
Rejected/violates migration policy/introduces a regression
Issues preventing migration:
autopkgtest for nanook/1.33+dfsg-6: amd64: Regression ♻ , arm64:
Regression ♻ , armhf: Not a regression, i386: Regression ♻ , ppc64el:
Regression ♻ , s390x: Regression ♻
Additional info:
49 days old
Also see bug 2103924 last updated on Sun Mar 23 13:23:36 2025
Once last-align is no longer blocked, its status on the bug can be set
to 'Invalid'.
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
