> On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 08:05:20PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 12:06:46PM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> > > I am concerned that the excuses page is ignoring that webkit2gtk
> > > 2.36.1-1 caused an autopkgtest regression for devhelp.
> > >
> > > https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/d/devhelp/kinetic/amd64
> > > https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html
> > >
> > > The regression was correctly caught in Debian:
> > > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/webkit2gtk
> > >
> > > I am concerned because I would expect other packages could have
> > > introduced regressions but been allowed in to Kinetic.
> >
> > It seems the state of the 2 autopkgtest-web workers is inconsistent,
> > not all results were copied up on all instances.
> >
> > I noticed that it retried a migration-reference/0 test after the failure
> > which indicated it did not allow the failure, but a later run might have
> > hit the different backend and hence might have a different view.
> >
> > So it's unclear if that's the reason, but bdmurray is cleaning that up
> > right now.
>
> The cleanup finished overnight and now both instances of the
> autopkgtest-web servers have the same information.
My test case is still broken. devhelp is not blocking webkit2gtk on
the excuses page.
Thank you,
Jeremy Bicha
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
